Lindkvist, Emilie, Pellowe, Kara E., Alexander, Steven M., Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth, Finkbeiner, Elena M., Girón‐Nava, Alfredo, González‐Mon, Blanca, Johnson, Andrew F., Pittman, Jeremy, Schill, Caroline, Wijermans, Nanda, Bodin, Örjan, Gelcich, Stefan and Glaser, Marion ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8910-900X (2022) Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries. Fish and Fisheries . DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12678.

[img] Text
Glaser2022.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.

Document Type: Article
Programme Area: PA2
Research affiliation: Affiliations > Not ZMT
Social Sciences > Social-Ecological Systems Analysis
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: No
DOI etc.: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12678
ISSN: 1467-2960
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2022 09:56
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2022 10:32
URI: http://cris.leibniz-zmt.de/id/eprint/4952

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item